How Looters Hide Money in Abandoned Houses – EFCC

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has revealed that its unrelenting war on corruption has forced looters of public funds to resort to hiding their loots in their abandoned properties.

The acting Chairman of the EFCC, Mr Ibrahim Magu, revealed this during a workshop titled “The Role of Professionals in the Fight Against Corruption’ in Abuja on Friday, the Punch reported

“People are now scared of keeping monies in banks, as it can be traced easily. Monies are now kept in abandoned houses in the country.”

 Magu asked Bureau de Change operators and financial institutions to desist from being used as conduit pipes to launder money.

“BDCs move billions of Naira in a day and there is no proper documentation of money laundered. I appeal to the BDCs to stop that, as we will begin to prosecute Bureau de Change operators to serve as deterrent. Bankers are also involved in corrupt acts, as they don’t carry out due diligence.’’

He asked professional bodies in the country to join hands with the anti-graft agency in the fight against corruption and economic crimes.

He added, “Instead of conniving with people to launder the proceeds of corruption, I beg you to join hands with the EFCC to fight corruption.

“Many professionals celebrate criminality by doing a lot to foster corruption, which adds more to money laundering. I don’t intend to criticise the work of professionals, but to solicit their support in order to make Nigeria better for the younger generation.’’

He said soon that the commission would soon be going after accounting firms that 

collaborate with bankers to steal government funds.

Meanwhile, Justice Fatun Riman of a Federal High Court, Kano, has granted the application of the EFCC to try a former Skye Bank staff, Yagana Bukar, in absentia on 10 count charges of money laundering.

Bukar who was first arraigned in October 2013 jumped bail soon after the commencement of trial.

Prosecuting counsel, M. S. Abubakar, had applied to the court, pursuant to Section 352(4) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, to continue with the trial despite the absence of the defendant.

Abubakar told the court that the defendant failed to appear during eight consecutive adjournments without any explanation.

The trial judge then granted the application of the prosecution, and directed the first prosecution witness.

OJPals, what do you think? Tell us in the comments!

@OJ’s Blog EXCLUSIVE